BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building building expert Wrangell Alaska landscaping construction building expert Wrangell Alaska Medical building building expert Wrangell Alaska housing building expert Wrangell Alaska industrial building building expert Wrangell Alaska townhome construction building expert Wrangell Alaska multi family housing building expert Wrangell Alaska office building building expert Wrangell Alaska custom homes building expert Wrangell Alaska condominiums building expert Wrangell Alaska condominium building expert Wrangell Alaska casino resort building expert Wrangell Alaska hospital construction building expert Wrangell Alaska high-rise construction building expert Wrangell Alaska concrete tilt-up building expert Wrangell Alaska low-income housing building expert Wrangell Alaska Subterranean parking building expert Wrangell Alaska production housing building expert Wrangell Alaska custom home building expert Wrangell Alaska mid-rise construction building expert Wrangell Alaska structural steel construction building expert Wrangell Alaska tract home building expert Wrangell Alaska
    Wrangell Alaska OSHA expert witness constructionWrangell Alaska eifs expert witnessWrangell Alaska building envelope expert witnessWrangell Alaska engineering expert witnessWrangell Alaska architecture expert witnessWrangell Alaska architectural expert witnessWrangell Alaska construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Wrangell, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Wrangell Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Wrangell Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Wrangell Alaska


    Blackstone Said to Sell Boston Buildings for $2.1 Billion

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    New Joint Venture to Develop a New Community in Orange County, California

    Court Holds That One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims Under B&P Section 7031

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    Primer Debuts on Life-Cycle Assessments of Embodied Carbon in Buildings

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    After Restoring Power in North Carolina, Contractor Faces Many Claims

    Buyer Alleges Condo Full of Mold and Mice

    Need to Cover Yourself for “Crisis” Changes on a Job Site? Try These Tips (guest post)

    Court Dismisses Cross Claims Against Utility Based on Construction Anti-Indemnity Statute

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Massachusetts SJC Clarifies “Strict Compliance” Standard in Construction Contracts

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    The Comcast Project is Not Likely to Be Shut Down Too Long

    Construction Worker Falls to His Death at Kyle Field

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Rose More Than Forecast to End 2014

    How Long is Your Construction Warranty?

    Cross-Motions for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings for COVID-19 Claim Denied

    Partner Denis Moriarty and Of Counsel William Baumgaertner Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2017

    Regions Where Residential Construction Should Boom in 2014

    Arizona Supreme Court Leaves Limits on Construction Defects Unclear

    Coverage Found For Cleanup of Superfund Site Despite Pollution Exclusion

    Three-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court Holds

    Building Inspector Refuses to State Why Apartments Condemned

    Wall Street’s Favorite Suburban Housing Bet Is Getting Crowded

    Client Alert: Michigan Insurance Company Not Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in California for Losses Suffered in Arkansas

    Delaware Supreme Court Won’t Halt Building

    While Starts Fall, Builder Confidence and Permits are on the Rise

    New Member Added to Seattle Law Firm Williams Kastner

    'There Was No Fighting This Fire,' California Survivor Says

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rise Most Since February 2006

    Google’s Floating Mystery Boxes Solved?

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Ranked on the 2017 "Best Law Firms" List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Negligence and Private Nuisance

    Landowners Try to Choke Off Casino's Water With 19th-Century Lawsuit

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    Design-build Trends, Challenges and Risk Mitigation

    Texas Supreme Court to Rehear Menchaca Bad Faith Case

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    Consultant’s Corner: Why Should Construction Business Owners Care about Cyber Liability Insurance?

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose in June at a Slower Pace

    A Landlord’s Guide to California’s New Statewide Rent Control Laws

    Wait! Don’t Sign Yet: Reviewing Contract Protections During the COVID Pandemic

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 43 White and Williams Lawyers

    Putting for a Cure: Don’t Forget to Visit BHA’s Booth at WCC to Support Charity

    Don’t Sign a Contract that Doesn’t Address Covid-19 (Or Pandemics and Epidemics)
    Corporate Profile

    WRANGELL ALASKA BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Wrangell, Alaska Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Wrangell's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Wrangell, Alaska

    Builders Seek to Modify Scaffold Law

    June 28, 2013 —
    New York’s scaffold law dates back to 1885 and requires contractors and building owners to take measures to protect worker from falls through “proper protection.” And although the law is more than 125 years old, Lou Colettie of the Building Trades Employers Association clams that the law “is going to destroy the construction industry.” On the other side, a former director of the NYC Central Labor Council says that builders want to get rid of the law because of “greed.” The New York Daily News notes that when workers using scaffolds or ladders are injured, the contractor must prove the site was safe. According to the claims of the building industry, this would let workers get settlements if their injuries were their own fault, such as working while intoxicated or failing to observe their employer’s safety procedures. A bill is currently working its way through the New York legislature that would make the employee’s actions relevant in an injury lawsuit. There have been past unsuccessful attempts to repeal the law, this year opponents are pushing to just amend it. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    July 08, 2011 —

    KCBD reports on the problems of a Lubbock, Texas contractor. It’s hard to do the job when your tools keep getting stolen. Corey Meadows, owner of Top Cut Interiors, told KCBD that he had chained an air compressor to a table saw. Since the thieves couldn’t cut the chain, they cut the table saw “and just took the air compressor and the chain.” Meadows estimates the thieves cost him $2,000 in damaged or stolen equipment and time lost.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Another Reminder that Contracts are Powerful in Virginia

    February 08, 2021 —
    Regular readers of this construction law blog are likely tired of my refrain that the contract is king here in Virginia. With few exceptions, some of which have been passed in the last few years, the contract can and does essentially set the “law” for the transaction. A recent opinion from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals confirms this principle. In Bracey v. Lancaster Foods, LLC, the Court looked at the question as to whether parties can contractually limit the statute of limitations in which a plaintiff or arbitration claimant can file its claim for relief. In Bracey, Michael Bracey, a truck driver, sued his former employer, Lancaster Foods, asserting various employment law claims. Lancaster moved to dismiss and compel arbitration based on the terms of an alternative dispute resolution agreement Bracey signed when he was hired, under which he consented to arbitration of any employment-related claim and waived all rights he may otherwise have had to a trial. Bracey challenged the arbitration clause, one that also included a 1-year limitation on the time in which Bracey was allowed to file any claim, as unconscionable. A federal judge in Maryland agreed and granted the motion to dismiss. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    March 28, 2012 —

    In multi-family construction defect litigation in Colorado, homeowners associations rely on associational standing to pursue claims affecting more than two units and to bring claims covering an entire development. This practice broadens an association’s case beyond what individual, aggrieved owners would otherwise bring on their own against a developer or builder-vendor. However, reliance on associational standing to combine homeowners’ defect claims into a single lawsuit has its drawbacks to homeowners.

    A recent order in the case Villa Mirage Condominium Owners’ Association, Inc., v. Stetson 162, LLC, et al., in El Paso County District Court, presents an example. There, the HOA unsuccessfully sought a determination from the court that its claims against subcontractors were not barred by the statute of limitations. To do so, the HOAs attempted to apply the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”), which governs the creation and operation of HOAs, and a statute intended to apply to persons under a legal disability.

    Under CCIOA, during the period of “declarant control” the developer may appoint members to the association’s executive board until sufficient homeowners have moved into the development and taken seats on the board.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Bret Cogdill of Higgins, Hopkins, McClain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. Cogdill can be contacted at cogdill@hhmrlaw.com.

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Legislative Update: Bid Protest Law Changes to Benefit Contractors

    November 24, 2019 —
    A new statute became effective July 28, 2019 that benefits contractors who have bid protests in Washington. A bid protest is the only way for disappointed bidders to challenge irregularities in the public bidding process on public works projects. Bid protests ensure the integrity of the public bidding system and are the contractor’s only remedy if its bid is improperly rejected or the winning bidder has errors in its bid that render it nonresponsive. Under the old law, a contractor was required to submit their bid protest within 2 days after the bid opening. The problem was that a contractor often does not know the basis to protest an award without seeing the other bids to determine whether the winning bid was responsive. Many owners provide copies of the bids if requested at the bid opening, but some contractors found that owners were refusing to provide copies of the other bids until after the 2-day protest period expired. The new law, which passed this last Legislative session[1], states that a contractor has two days after the bid opening to either submit a written protest or request copies of the competing bids. If the contractor requests copies of the competing bids from the owner, the contractor then has until 2 days after the competing bids are provided by the owner before the contractor is required to submit its bid protest. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brett M. Hill, Ahlers Cressman Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at brett.hill@acslawyers.com

    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    August 20, 2014 —
    Emergency services in the northern German city of Dusseldorf are preparing to evacuate more than 4,000 people, including residents of a retirement home, as work gets under way to disarm a World War II bomb discovered during construction work yesterday. A further 15,000 people, living within a 1 kilometer (0.6 mile) radius of the site, are being asked to stay indoors and keep away from windows, authorities said in a press release published on its website. The disposal is scheduled for 4 p.m. Roads in the vicinity are expected to remain closed until at least 5 p.m. The 500-kilogram (1,100 pound) U.S. aircraft bomb was unearthed on the site of the former Reitzenstein army barracks, which is being redeveloped as a residential area. It’s the fourth or fifth find since last year in the northeastern district of Moersenbroich, where new apartment buildings and houses are under construction, Tobias Schuelpen, a press spokesman for the local fire service, said by phone. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dorothee Tschampa, Bloomberg
    Ms. Tschampa may be contacted at dtschampa@bloomberg.net

    Following Mishaps, D.C. Metro Presses on With Repairs

    February 23, 2017 —
    An aggressive effort to overhaul the aging Metro system in Washington, D.C., is producing results as it nears the one-year mark, with more than 28,000 cross-ties and nearly two miles of grout pads now replaced. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, ENR
    ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    Use It or Lose It: California Court of Appeal Addresses Statutes of Limitations for Latent Construction Defects and Damage to Real Property

    August 02, 2017 —
    The First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal recently confirmed California’s latent defect statute of limitations, codified in California Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15, bars only claims based on construction defects. Estuary Owners Association v. Shell Oil Company, No. A145516, (Cal. Ct. App. July 26, 2017). The Court also reemphasized that under California’s three-year statute of limitations for damage to real property, delineated in California Code of Civil Procedure section 338(b), the actual and constructive knowledge of the prior landowner is imputed to the current landowner. Estuary Owners Association concerned the development and construction of a 100-unit condominium by Signature at the Estuary, LLC (“Signature”) on land Shell Oil Company (“Shell”) previously used as a fuel distribution terminal. Construction of the condominiums was completed in 2006. In 2008, it was discovered that residual concentrations of petroleum related chemicals remained in the soil, soil gas, and groundwater beneath the development. Later that year, Signature revealed that the condominiums had been constructed with moisture barriers beneath the building slabs instead of the vapor/gas barriers called for in the corrective action plan. Reprinted courtesy of Omar Parra, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Jesse M. Sullivan, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Mr. Parra may be contacted at oparra@hbblaw.com Mr. Sullivan may be contacted at jsullivan@hbblaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of