BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building building expert Noorvik Alaska landscaping construction building expert Noorvik Alaska low-income housing building expert Noorvik Alaska custom homes building expert Noorvik Alaska multi family housing building expert Noorvik Alaska Medical building building expert Noorvik Alaska retail construction building expert Noorvik Alaska mid-rise construction building expert Noorvik Alaska townhome construction building expert Noorvik Alaska casino resort building expert Noorvik Alaska industrial building building expert Noorvik Alaska production housing building expert Noorvik Alaska hospital construction building expert Noorvik Alaska Subterranean parking building expert Noorvik Alaska high-rise construction building expert Noorvik Alaska parking structure building expert Noorvik Alaska condominiums building expert Noorvik Alaska condominium building expert Noorvik Alaska concrete tilt-up building expert Noorvik Alaska structural steel construction building expert Noorvik Alaska office building building expert Noorvik Alaska custom home building expert Noorvik Alaska
    Noorvik Alaska construction claims expert witnessNoorvik Alaska building code compliance expert witnessNoorvik Alaska hospital construction expert witnessNoorvik Alaska building consultant expertNoorvik Alaska civil engineer expert witnessNoorvik Alaska consulting general contractorNoorvik Alaska construction project management expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Noorvik, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Noorvik Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Noorvik Alaska Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Noorvik Alaska


    Supreme Court of Idaho Rules That Substantial Compliance With the Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act Suffices to Bring Suit

    California Appeals Court Says Loss of Use Is “Property Damage” Under Liability Policy, and Damages Can be Measured by Diminished Value

    California Supreme Court Rights the “Occurrence” Ship: Unintended Harm Resulting from Intentional Conduct Triggers Coverage Under Liability Insurance Policy

    A Primer on Insurance for Construction Projects

    The Economic Loss Rule and the Disclosure of Latent Defects: In re the Estate of Carol S. Gattis

    Good Ole Duty to Defend

    DC Circuit Upholds EPA’s Latest RCRA Recycling Rule

    California Booms With FivePoint New Schools: Real Estate

    Coloradoans Deserve More Than Hyperbole and Rhetoric from Plaintiffs’ Attorneys; We Deserve Attainable Housing

    Indemnitor Owes Indemnity Even Where Indemnitee is Actively Negligent, California Court Holds

    Plehat Brings Natural Environments into Design Tools

    No Duty to Defend Suit That Is Threatened Under Strict Liability Statute

    Homebuilders See Record Bearish Bets on Shaky Recovery

    Last Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking Ball

    Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause

    California Supreme Court Endorses City Authority to Adopt Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

    Hyundai to Pay 47M to Settle Construction Equipment's Alleged Clean Air Violations

    Construction Laborers Sue Contractors Over Wage Theft

    Environmental Roundup – May 2019

    Nevada Governor Signs Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Professional Liability and Attorney-Client Privilege Bulletin: Intra-Law Firm Communications

    Trumark Homes Hired James Furey as VP of Land Acquisition

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Lessons from the Sept. 19 Mexico Earthquake

    Mass-Timber Furnished Apartments Fare Well in Fire Tests

    Justice Didn’t Ensure Mortgage Fraud Was Priority, IG Says

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    Homebuilder Confidence Takes a Beating

    Quick Note: Independent Third-Party Spoliation Of Evidence Claim

    The Drought Is Sinking California

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    Whether Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is an Occurrence Creates Ambiguity

    Know and Meet Your Notice Requirements or Lose Your Payment Bond Claims

    New Plan Submitted for Explosive Demolition of Old Tappan Zee Bridge

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    Partners Patti Santelle and Gale White honored by as "Top Women in Law" The Legal Intelligencer

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Components of an Effective Provision

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    The Starter Apartment Is Nearly Extinct in San Francisco and New York

    Shutdowns? What A Covid-19-Safe Construction Site Looks Like

    Crypto and NFTs Could Help People Become Real Estate Tycoons

    What If an Irma-Like Hurricane Hit the New York City Metro Area?

    Is There a Conflict of Interest When a CD Defense Attorney Becomes Coverage Counsel Post-Litigation?

    District Court Allows DBE False Claims Act Case to Proceed

    Housing Affordability Down

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Area Variance Standard; Property Owners May Obtain an Area Variance When Special Circumstances Existed at Purchase
    Corporate Profile

    NOORVIK ALASKA BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Noorvik, Alaska Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Noorvik's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Noorvik, Alaska

    Two More Lawsuits Filed Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses

    April 13, 2020 —
    Two more lawsuits were filed yesterday concerning business interruption losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The plaintiffs, the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations, filed their lawsuits, copies of which can be found here and here, in Oklahoma state court against a litany of property insurers, led by AIG. The lawsuits seek an order that any financial losses suffered by the nations’ casinos, restaurants and other businesses as a result of the coronavirus pandemic are covered by the nations’ insurance policies. According to the complaints:
    On or about March of 2020, the United States of America became infected by COVID 19 resulting in a pandemic. As a result of this pandemic and infection, the Nation’s Property sustained direct physical loss or damage and will continue to sustain direct physical loss or damage covered by the policies, including but not limited to business interruption, extra expense, interruption by civil authority, limitations on ingress and egress, and expenses to reduce loss. As a direct result of this pandemic and infection, the Nation’s Property has been damaged, as described above, and cannot be used for its intended purpose.
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@HuntonAK.com

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    June 10, 2011 —

    The California Court of Appeals has ruled against a couple who sued their lawyer, after they were unhappy with the results of a construction defect case. Craig and Jeanne Petrik sued Mahaffey and Associates for legal malpractice and breach of contract. Their lawyer, Douglas L. Mahaffey, had settled their case for $400,000. The Petricks claimed Mahaffey did not have the authority make an offer to compromise.

    In the original case, Mahaffey held back the $400,000 awarded in the settlement until he and the Petricks came to terms on how much of that was owed to Mahaffey. The lower court concluded that the Petricks were due $146,323,18. The jury did not agree with the Petrik’s claim that conditions had been met in which Mahaffey would not be charging them costs.

    Judges O’Leary and Ikola wrote the opinion, with the third judge on the panel, Judge Bedworth offering a dissent only on their view of the cost waiver clause.

    Read the court’s opinion

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Pile Test Likely for Settling Millennium Tower

    October 04, 2021 —
    A pilot pile program to prove the efficacy of a less-disruptive method for the paused foundation fix at the ailing Millennium Tower in San Francisco could begin the week of Oct. 4. Accelerated settling and tilt—caused by a pile upgrade intended to correct settlement of the 645-ft-tall residential condominium—ceased after Aug. 20, when the engineer-of-record halted the $100-million fix. Reprinted courtesy of Nadine M. Post, Engineering News-Record Ms. Post may be contacted at postn@enr.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    January 10, 2018 —

    On December 28, 2017, the Ohio Court of Appeals (Eighth District) held in GrafTech International, Ltd., et al. v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., et al., No. 105258 that coverage for alleged injurious exposures to coal tar pitch was barred by a liability insurance policy’s absolute pollution exclusion. Applying Ohio law, the court concluded that Pacific Employers had no duty to defend GrafTech or pay defense costs in connection with claims by dozens of workers at Alcoa smelting plants that they were exposed to hazardous substances in GrafTech products supplied to Alcoa as early as 1942.

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Court Holds That Trimming of Neighbor’s Trees is Not an Insured Accident or Occurrence

    June 10, 2015 —
    In Albert v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. (No. B257792, filed 4/28/15, ord. pub. 5/20/15), a California Court of Appeal held that an insured’s trimming of a neighbor’s trees which allegedly damaged the trees was not an accident or occurrence covered by her homeowners insurance, despite a mistaken and good faith belief as to where the property line lay. Ms. Albert was sued by her adjoining neighbor, who alleged damage to his property when she erected an encroaching fence and pruned nine mature olive trees on his property. The two parcels shared a reciprocal roadway easement providing for access to the main public road. At some point, Ms. Albert erected a fence that was subsequently determined to be on the neighbor’s land, and which enclosed a grove of nine mature olive trees. Ms. Albert claimed that the trees straddled the property line and were mutually owned. She pointed out that she had regularly been notified by the Los Angeles Fire Department to clear the area, and that she had been trimming the trees for years. Thus, she claimed a good faith belief that the trees were hers and that she was required to trim them. Contending that her trimming had caused severe damage by reducing the aesthetic and monetary value of the trees, the neighbor sued alleging causes of action for trespass to real property and trees; abatement of private nuisance; declaratory relief; and for quiet title. He sought treble damages under Civil Code sections 733 and 3346, for injury to timber or trees. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Kendrick, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Valerie A. Moore, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Mr. Kendrick may be contacted at ckendrick@hbblaw.com; Ms. Moore may be contacted at vmoore@hbblaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Suit Limitation Provision Upheld

    March 04, 2019 —
    The policy's one year suit limitation provision was upheld, depriving insureds of benefits under the policy. Oswald v. South Central Mut. Ins. Co., 2018 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1077 (Dec. 24, 2018). The Oswalds' hog barn burned down on June 21, 2016. Arson was a possible cause. The Oswalds were insured under a combination policy issued by North Star Mutual Insurance Company and South Central Mutual Insurance Company. Central provided coverage for basic perils, broad perils, and limited perils, which included fire losses. The Central policy required property claims to be brought within one year after the loss. By endorsement, the North Star policy required suits be brought within two years after the loss. Presumably, the claims was denied, although the decision does not state this. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    November 13, 2013 —
    South Carolina State Plastering claimed in the South Carolina Court of Appeals that communication between attorneys and residents of a retirement community could undermine the judgment in the case. Residents of Sun City had filed a class action lawsuit over problems with stucco in the community. Phillip Segul, the plaintiffs’ attorney, noted that plasterer was “directly communicating with the class members and getting them to sign opt-outs and releases of their claims,” although this was something that Everett Kendall, the plasterer’s attorney denied. The lawsuit has been grinding along for six years. Some residents fear they won’t outlive the construction defect lawsuit. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Bert L. Howe & Associates to Join All-Star Panel at West Coast Casualty Seminar

    March 26, 2014 —
    Don MacGregor of Bert L. Howe & Associates, a consulting firm, will join fellow panelists Hon. Peter Lichtman (ret), Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock (ret), Peter S. Curry, Brian Kahn, Esq., and Paul R. Kiesel, Esq in a break-out discussion entitled “Working Smarter with Technology” at this year’s West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar being held May 15th-16th at the world-famous Disneyland Hotel in Anaheim, California. West Coast Casualty's Construction Defect Seminar is the largest seminar of its kind worldwide focusing on all of the elements of the prosecution, defense, coverage and technologies of construction defect claims and litigation from a national perspective. With offices in California, Nevada, Colorado, Florida and Texas (Houston & San Antonio), Bert L. Howe & Associates provides construction consulting and expert witness services to insurance professionals and lawyers specializing in construction defect litigation, construction risk analysis, and property claims arising from construction-related activities. Download an Invitation and Register... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of